Legal Opinion
Wien v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided July 22, 2005No. 349, 2004PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice.
The defendant-below appellant, Daniel Wien, appeals from his conviction in the Superior Court of three counts of violating the Wetlands Act. 1 On appeal Wien maintains that (1) the statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad; and that the Superior Court erred: (2) by denying his motion to suppress evidence that (Wien contends) was the product of an illegal search of his property; (3) by excluding as irrelevant certain testimony that Wien sought to have admitted; and (4) by failing properly to instruct the jury on the mental state required to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Marvin Rubenstein, AKA Jacob Rubenstein, Isaac RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de SalesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Coleman v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.