Legal Opinion
Dow v. Casale
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided July 19, 2011No. SUCV201001343BLS1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lauriat, Peter M., J.
Russell Dow (“Dow”) filed this action against his former employers, Gregory Casale (“Casale”), James Strahle (“Strahle”) and Lawrence Baker (“Baker”) (collectively, the “defendants”), claiming a violation of the Massachusetts Wage Act, G.L.c. 149, §§148 and 150 (the “Wage Act”). Now before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.1 For the reasons set forth below, certain of the motions are allowed, and others are denied.
BACKGROUND
The parties have stipulated to the following facts. Beginning on January 3, 2006, Dow was employed as the sole salesperson…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Miller v. MooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- O'CONNELL v. ChasdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Wiedmann v. Bradford Group, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Cabot Corp. v. AVX Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nekoroski v. MathaiMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012
- Dow v. CasaleMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013