Legal Opinion

Wiedmann v. Bradford Group, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 21, 2005PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

This case involves a dispute concerning the formula that was to be used to calculate Come Wiedmann’s (plaintiff’s) commissioned wages pursuant to the terms of an oral employment contract. The dispute led to the plaintiff’s commencing an action in September, 2001, asserting claims *700under the common law and G. L. c. 149, § 148, the weekly payment of wages law (weekly wage law).3

In the course of the lawsuit, the plaintiff discovered that the defendants4 did not retain her employment records. On February 5, 2003, she filed a motion for sanctions based on the defendants’ spoliation of evidence…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. LaLonde v. EissnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Dartt v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Somers v. Converged Access, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Melia v. Zenhire, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Matamoros v. Starbucks CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. DiFiore v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Lipsitt v. PlaudMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API