Legal Opinion

Miller v. Mooney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 2000PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The plaintiffs, Harriet C. Miller, John K. Coggins, Carol C. Powell, and Laurel C. Oleynick, are the children and heirs of Estelle Pickett Coggins. The defendant is an attorney admitted to practice in Massachusetts, whose law office is on Nantucket. Estelle Coggins was a client of the defendant. The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendant based on erroneous statements he made during their mother’s lifetime *58regarding the terms of her will, raising claims of legal malpractice, breach of contract, negligence, and a violation of G. L. c. 93A. On cross motions for summary judgment, a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Spinner v. NuttMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Tetrault v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Braunstein v. McCabeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Alicea v. MacHete MusicCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. Okerman v. VA Software Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Albrecht v. CliffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API