Legal Opinion
Watson v. City of Newark
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 31, 1984No. 84-5289PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge:
Ronald E. Watson, Ronald Anderson and Dixie D. Wilson are employees of the City of Newark, Delaware, who claim that their right to political expression is unconstitutionally denied to them by Section 1104 of the Charter of the City of Newark (1965), as amended. These employees specifically complain about the following language:
No person who holds any paid appointive city position shall make, solicit or receive, or be in any manner concerned in the making, soliciting or receiving of any *1009assessment, subscription or contribution to any candidate for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Solar Turbines Inc. v. SeifCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Prusky Ex Rel. Windsor Securities, Inc. v. Reliastar Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Mitchell v. HaldarSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Rosen v. RuckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Tickles v. PNC BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.