Legal Opinion

Devereaux v. Harper

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1962No. Civ. 6787PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, P. J.—

Plaintiffs and appellants, Theodore C. Devereaux and W. R. Scull, individually and doing business as Devereaux-Scull Co., a copartnership, licensed real estate brokers, brought this action against defendants and respondents R W. Harper, Lila C. Witcher, Marion Fesler Marchand and De Anza Harbor, Inc., a corporation, et al, for the sum of $75,000 alleged to be due them as the result of their having located a purchaser for defendants’ property and because defendants failed to complete the sale thereof.

The complaint is in two counts. The first seeks recovery upon the written 11…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Steve Schmidt & Co. v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Martin v. Culver Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Lamle v. MattelCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API