Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court v. Petersen

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 2006No. S-04-1173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented in this attorney disciplinary proceeding is what sanction should be imposed on the respondent, Thomas M. Petersen, for his serial neglect of client matters. For the reasons that follow, we impose an indefinite suspension from the practice of law with no possibility of reinstatement prior to February 1, 2008.

BACKGROUND

There were no exceptions filed to the referee’s report in this case. When no exceptions to the referee’s findings of fact are filed by either party in a disciplinary proceeding, the court may, at its discretion, adopt the findings of the referee as final and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. ApkerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. JamesNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Prucha v. KahlandtNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. PetersenNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. CouncilNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. HoganNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. NimmerNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court v. WidtfeldtNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API