Legal Opinion

Prucha v. Kahlandt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2000No. S-99-694PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHendry, C.J.

INTRODUCTION

Robert E. Prucha (Prucha) and Cathy L. Prucha filed an appeal from a decision rendered by “fence viewers,” who are individuals appointed by the county to settle disputes over fences. The fence viewers ordered the installation of a new fence along the boundary line between the Pruchas’ property and adjoining land owned by Lloyd H. Kahlandt (Kahlandt) and Mary E. Kahlandt. The district court for Burt County determined that the Pruchas had failed to proceed by petition in error, and thus the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter. The Pruchas now appeal. We granted the Pruchas’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Putnam v. FortenberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gestring v. Mary Lanning Memorial Hospital Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hron v. DonlanNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Torres v. Aulick Leasing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Abdullah v. NEBRASKA DEPT. OF CORR. SERV.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rath v. City of SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hawkins v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Vopalka v. AbrahamNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Dossett v. First State Bank, LoomisNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. J.B. Contracting Services, Inc. v. Universal Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API