Nabors v. Malone
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION MALINDA NABORS PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-cv-00164-DAS PETE MALONE d/b/a SUBWAY DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter arises on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [71]. After considering the matter, the court finds as follows: Facts and Procedural History Malinda Nabors alleges her employer, Pete Malone, violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by “routinely providing much younger employees many more hours of work per week than those scheduled for Plaintiff.”1 She also…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- TIG Insurance v. Sedgwick James of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Rommie STULTS and Stephen Wallace, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONOCO, INC. and Brad Burmaster, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.