Legal Opinion

Rommie STULTS and Stephen Wallace, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONOCO, INC. and Brad Burmaster, Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 29, 1996No. 95-10167PublishedCited by 304 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. PARKER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s granting of defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Finding no error, we affirm.

I. FACTS

Plaintiffs Stults and Wallace were employees of Defendant Conoco, Inc. While employed by Conoco, plaintiffs each held the position of store manager. Plaintiff Stults was terminated on or around May 25, 1991 by his immediate supervisor, district manager Connie Lutton. Plaintiff Wallace resigned from his position with Conoco on or around July 14,1992, after a meeting with his immediate supervisor, district manager Danise Chatham. At all…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by304 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Malacara v. GarberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Peter Clayton McClendon v. City of Columbia, City of Columbia James R. CarneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Medina v. Ramsey Steel Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

299 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API