Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Duffey

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 29, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The validity of the provisions of paragraphs III, IV, V and VI of the will here under consideration has been attacked upon this proceeding by the executor to render and settle its account as violative of section 11 of the Personal Property Law and section 42 of the Real Property Law. By the terms of paragraph “ III ” the testator granted to his trustee all of his property, real and personal, in trust “ * * * to invest the same *141and keep the same invested, and to receive the rents, issues, income and profits therefrom and to hold and pay the same as hereinafter directed.” Paragraphs…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Herzog v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Schettler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Brown v. . QuintardNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. In Re the Will of HornerNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ForteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of BurlingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of PerelmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re DuffeyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API