In re the Estate of Perelman
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
This is an appeal from the pro forma taxing order heretofore entered in this proceeding. The facts are not in dispute and concededly the propriety of the assessment levied by the appraiser turns upon the question of the construction of the will.
Testator was survived by a widow and three sons, who at the time of his death were approximately twenty, twenty-one and twenty-three years of age. Except for a specific gift of testator’s jewelry to his sons and a direction for the expenditure of a suitable sum for a tombstone, the sole dispositive provisions of the will direct the erection…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re HornidgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re Bankers Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- In re the Estate of HowellsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of HartfieldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of WeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of ForteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of De CosterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934