Watkins v. Peterson Enterprises, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
In an action alleging violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692a-1692o, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington certified three questions relating to whether RCW 6.27 allows a creditor to recover attorney fees and taxable costs when filing successive writs of garnishment absent a judgment against the garnishee. Plaintiffs Percy Watkins and Diane Bohnet maintain that the statute not only precludes automatic and cumulative recovery of such costs, particularly where a writ is unsuccessful, but also that a creditor must obtain a separate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Srcc v. Public Disclosure Com'nWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Seattle v. FontanillaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Senate Republican Campaign Committee v. Public Disclosure CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Wyman, Partridge & Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Watkins v. Peterson Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1999
- Bartel v. ZucktriegelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Bartel v. ZucktriegelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.