Legal Opinion

Wilson v. City of Zanesville

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1935No. 25401PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The inquiry presented is whether the provisions of the ordinance requiring the closing of barber shops in Zanesville before eight o'clock a. m. and after six o'clock p. m. on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday, and before eight o'clock a. m. and after twelve o'clock noon on Thursday and before eight o'clock a. m. and after eight o'clock p. m. on Saturday or days (other than Sunday) before certain named holidays, are within a proper exercise of the police power.

The first question requiring attention is the power of the municipality as to local police regulations generally. Section34 of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Direct Plumbing Supply Co. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Louisville v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Olds v. KlotzOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. STOLZ v. J & B STEEL ERECTORS, INC., Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API