Legal Opinion

Henry v. Prendergast

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1911No. 7,222PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Shelby Circuit Court; Will M. Sparks, Judge. Action by Catherine Prendergast as administratrix of the estate of Leo Prendergast, deceased, against Charles L. Henry, receiver of the Indianapolis and Cincinnati Traction Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant receiver appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, J.

— Action by appellee as administratrix of the estate of Leo Prendergast against appellant, as receiver of the Indianapolis and Cincinnati Traction Company, Philip Wilk and William Redman, for damages for the negligent killing of Leo Prendergast, by reason of his receiving an electric shock while working in the ear barn of said company at Shelbyville. The action was first brought in the Rush Circuit Court and the venue was changed to the Shelby Circuit Court. Issues were formed by a complaint in one paragraph to which a demurrer was overruled, and an answer in general denial filed. The jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. PrzezdziankowskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Walker v. TowleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Taylor v. CanadayIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Decatur v. EadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Smith v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Hines v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Heinhold v. Bishop Motor Express, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
  5. McStay v. PrzychockiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API