Legal Opinion

Villanella v. Godbey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1994No. 30A01-9309-CV-302PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Today we decide whether IND.CODE 29-1-17-13, which bars all suits against the personal representative of an estate after one year of discharge, applies to actions involving nonprobate assets.

Appellant-plaintiffs Rosella Villanella, Mary Lewis, Candace Hyde, Patricia Nico, Lee Boucher, and Ann Hoffman (the Family) appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant William Godbey, as executor of the estate of Claude Boucher, on its claim that Godbey unlawfully transferred assets from Claude to Geneva. The Family also challenges the trial court's…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Hunter v. MilhousIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Tucher v. Brothers Auto Salvage Yard, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Rogers v. National City Bank of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Strong v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Grub v. Estate of WadeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Plesha v. Edmonds Ex Rel. EdmondsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. McCart v. Chief Executive Officer in Charge, Independent Federal Credit UnionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Carlson v. WarrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API