Legal Opinion
Plesha v. Edmonds Ex Rel. Edmonds
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 1999No. 45A04-9904-CV-168PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Nicholas and Randie Plesha appeal from a judgment in favor of Robert and Debbie Edmonds, individually and as the parents of Robert G. Edmonds, Jr. (“Rob”), a minor. The Edmonds filed their complaint for damages against the Pleshas after Rob was bitten by the Pleshas’ dog, Sampson. The Edmonds alleged, and the trial court found, that the Pleshas violated a Hammond city ordinance (“Ordinance”) which requires that dogs be kept under restraint.
We affirm.
ISSUES
We restate and address the following issues:
1. Whether the trial court erred when it denied the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Spaulding v. International Bakers Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Klebes v. Forest Lake Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Royer v. Pryor Ex Rel. PryorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rush v. Elkhart County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lachenman v. SticeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kho v. PenningtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Bowyer v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Jessica Kishpaugh v. John Odegard and Miriam OdegardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Taflinger Farm v. UhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.