Blue Mountain Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
The Blue Mountain Telephone & Telegraph Company filed with the Public Utility Commission a proposed tariff for increased rates, which was suspended by the Commission for six months. Three hearings were then held and every opportunity was given the Telephone Company to meet its burden of proof that the proposed rates Avere just and reasonable. It appeals from the final order of the Commission requiring it to withdraw the proposed tariff and in lieu thereof to file a tariff designed to produce $202,900 annually, an increase in revenue of $24,177. The proposed tariff was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pusey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Equitable Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by28 opinions
- Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- DeMasi v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.