Legal Opinion
DeMasi v. Weiss
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 8, 1982No. Nos. 81-2171, 81-2192PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
These original mandamus proceedings arise out of an on-going civil antitrust action, Weiss v. York Hospital, 524 F.Supp. 433 (M.D.Pa.), and require us to decide at No. 81-2192 whether to order the district court to decertify the plaintiff class, and at No. 81-2171 whether to order the district court to set aside a discovery order. We will deny the petitions at this time but retain jurisdiction over the petition at No. 81-2171 pending disposition of the trial on liability.
*116I.
Dr. Malcolm Weiss, an osteopathic physician,1 brought the underlying district…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Kershner v. MazurkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.