Legal Opinion
Scott v. Homestake-Sapin
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1963No. 7235PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
Claimant appeals from a workmen’s compensation award of 30% disability granted him by the district court.
The only effort made to attack the findings is to relate part of the testimony, which the claimant urges required different findings to be made by the trial court. This attempt is in no sense in compliance with Supreme Court Rule 15(6) (§ 21-2-1(15) (6), N.M.S.A.1953), and, therefore, will not be considered. Under such circumstances, in accordance with our long-standing rule, the findings as made by the trial court are the findings before us. Rone v. Calvary Baptist…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lozano v. ArcherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Industrial Supply Company v. GoenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Batte v. Stanley'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Churchill v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Pies v. Bekins Van and Storage CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Thornton v. Hesselden Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Dillon v. KingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Adams v. HeisenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Ledbetter v. Lanham Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.