Legal Opinion

Adams v. Heisen

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1967No. 7964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPIESS, Judge, Court of Appeals.

This appeal is from a judgment in a replevin action wherein the trial court found that plaintiff (appellant), P. G. Adams was not entitled to the possession of 5,719 cubic yards of processed gravel which had been delivered to him under the writ of replevin and awarded damages to defendants (appellees), Charles Heisen and Dick Santillanes against the plaintiff for wrongful replevin.

The facts out of which this dispute arose may be stated as follows:

Santillanes was the owner of a tract of land in Socorro County which contained a deposit of sand and gravel…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chain Belt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Petrelli v. West Virginia-Pittsburgh Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Arias v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Conaway v. Time Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New Mexico Sheriffs & Police Ass'n v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API