Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thornton v. Hesselden Construction Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1969No. 8654PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMODY, Justice.

Plaintiff, as a subcontractor, sought to recover the sum of $3,357.97 which he claimed was owed on two painting subcontracts and the further sum of $3,803.54 for extra work. Following trial to the court, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

The two questions raised on appeal are primarily matters of substantial evidence and relate to the findings made by the trial court, or its refusal to find as requested by the plaintiff.

The defendant construction company was the prime contractor for certain buildings at New Mexico State University.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Herrera v. C & R PAVING COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hugh K. Gale Post No. 2182 Veterans of Foreign Wars v. NorrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bogle v. PotterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Michael v. BaumanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Steinbaugh v. Payless Drug Store, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ShermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Huckins v. RitterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mathieson v. HublerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Tabet Lumber Company v. ChalamidasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Smith v. GalioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API