Legal Opinion

Pieretti v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1990No. 1632 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

Connie Pieretti (Claimant) seeks review of that portion of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) denying Claimant’s request for a remand to the referee for assessment of counsel fees against Denny’s, Inc. (Employer) on the basis of an unreasonable contest. 1 Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, added by Section 3 of the Act of February 8, 1972, P.L. 25, 77 P.S. § 996. 2 The issue presented for review is whether the referee and Board erred in failing to assess Claimant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Edmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Poli v. WORK. COMP. APPEAL BOARDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Penczkowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Boro of Midland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Battiste v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Eidell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Arbogast & Bastian v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Erdell v. Wcab (Dana Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Hill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API