Arbogast & Bastian v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARBIERI, Senior Judge.
Arbogast and Bastían (Employer) requests our review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) assessing counsel fees against it for unreasonable contest. We will reverse.
Paul L. Moyer, (Claimant), suffered a work-related injury on July 20, 1977, for which compensation was paid under a Notice of Compensation Payable until, based upon the opinion and report of Dr. Christopher G. Lynch, pursuant to an examination by this physician on November 18, 1987, Employer filed a Termination Petition as supported by Dr. Lynch that Claimant could do light or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weidner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Boothman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Pieretti v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eidell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Crouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Erdell v. Wcab (Dana Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Steeple v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Crouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.