Edminster v. Thorp
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Plaintiffs, Phillip Maurice Edminster and his wife, Laura G. Edminster, brought this action to recover damages for injuries suffered by Mrs. Edminster which were alleged to have been sustained in an automobile accident due to negligence on the part of defendant Howard Thorp, an employee of defendant Watkins Lumber Company, which company was the owner of the ear of which Thorp was the driver. Defendants admitted negligence and liability, and the only issue tried was that of damages. A judgment in favor of Mrs. Edminster based upon the verdict of a jury has been satisfied.
This appeal is taken…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perry v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Meek v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Martin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Hoffmann v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Tornell v. MunsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gist v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Paul v. KirkendallUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Black v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1967
- Amalia M. Filice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Deshotel v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.