Legal Opinion

Amalia M. Filice v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1954No. 13815_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, who is the wife of Frank H. Filice, brought an action against the United States in the district court under the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b), alleging that the defendant, ácting by and through its agent, servant and employee, so carelessly and negligently managed and operated a certain truck in Santa Clara County, California, that the same collided with an automobile operated by plaintiff’s husband. In consequence of this negligence and carelessness, the plaintiff alleges, the husband sustained severe personal injuries which required his hospitalization for many…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Follansbee v. BenzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Edminster v. ThorpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Deshotel v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Rush v. Great American Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Hoffman v. DautelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Josephine Miskunas v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  5. Kronenbitter v. Washburn Wire Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API