Legal Opinion

Tornell v. Munson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1947No. Civ. 7313PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Plaintiffs seek to recover damages from defendants by reason of defendants’ alleged negligent operation of their automobile. By their answer defendants denied plaintiffs’ claim and affirmatively alleged that the injuries, if any, suffered by plaintiffs resulted from their own negligence. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs in-the sum of $3,000. Both parties moved for a new trial — the defendants upon substantially all of the statutory grounds — the plaintiffs primarily upon the ground of insufficiency of the damages. The order of the trial court denying defendants’ motion and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Donnatin v. Union Hardware & Metal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Gersick v. ShillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Germ v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API