Legal Opinion

Hansel v. Sherman Textiles

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8010IC207Published

1Opinion of the Court

270 S.E.2d 585 (1980)

Pauline C. HANSEL, Employee-Plaintiff,

v.

SHERMAN TEXTILES, Employer,

Travelers Insurance Company, Carrier-Defendants.

No. 8010IC207.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 7, 1980.

Frederick R. Stann, Gastonia, for employee-plaintiff.

Hollowell, Stott & Hollowell by Grady B. Stott, Gastonia, for carrier-defendants.

ERWIN, Judge.

Defendants raise assignments of error to the findings of fact by the full Commission. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that the Commission's findings are not supported by sufficient competent evidence to support the award and, therefore,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Inscoe v. DeRose Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Moore v. JP STEVENS & CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API