American Innotek, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Patent Infringement; 28 U.S.C. § 1498; Pri- or Art; 35 U.S.C. § 102; Priority Date; 35 U.S.C. § 120; Invalidity; Obviousness; 35 U.S.C. § 103; Graham Factors; Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness; Nexus Requirement; Commercial Success; Long-felt Need; Copying.
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge
This patent infringement case involves bags for the containment and disposal of bodily fluids. Plaintiff, American Innotek, Inc., claims that the United States infringed its 1992 patent, United States Patent No. 5,116,139 (“the ’139 Patent”) entitled “Fluid Containment Bag,” by purchasing and using the…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- ArrMaz Products Inc v. Rieth-Riley Construction Co IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
- Goodwill Industries of South Florida, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Ni-Q, LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022