Legal Opinion
Ni-Q, LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 1, 2022No. 3:17-cv-00934Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON NI-Q, LLC, Case No. 3:17-cv-934-SI Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. PROLACTA BIOSCIENCE, INC., Defendant. Brenna K. Legaard, K & L GATES LLP, One SW Columbia Street, Suite 1900, Portland, OR 97204. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff. Kristin L. Cleveland, KLARKQUIST SPARKMAN LLP, 121 SW Salmon Street, Suite 1600, Portland, OR 97204; Orion Armon, COOLEY LLP, 1144 15th Street, Suite 2300, Denver, CO 80202; Alexandra Mayhugh, COOLEY LLP, 1333 2nd Street, Suite 400, Santa Monica, CA 90401; David Burns and M. Howard Morse, COOLEY LLP, 1299…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.