Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Rosenthal

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 16, 1889No. 57PublishedCited by 11 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The' case as stated by the court in the opinion was as follows : . This was an action brought to recover duty alleged to have been illegally exacted by the defendant, as collector of the port of New York, upon certain merchandise imported by the plaintiffs.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The' case as stated by the court in the opinion was as follows : . This was an action brought to recover duty alleged to have been illegally exacted by the defendant, as collector of the port of New York, upon certain merchandise imported by the plaintiffs. It was stipulated on the trial -that if the plaintiffs should be entitled to recover on the main question raised by their protest, a verdict should be entered generallyin plaintiffs’ favor, subject to adjustment as to formal requisites and to amount, at…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

The articles in question were -ordinary headless -hair-pins, made of steel wire and iron wire, and the question is whether they were dutiable as “ pins, solid-head or other.”

By section 13 of the act of July 14, 1862, 12 Stát. 555, 557, c. 163, a duty of five per centum ad valorem, in addition to then existing duties, was levied on many articles, including “ pins, solid-head or other,” and “ manufactures, articles, vessels and wares, not otherwise provided for, of gold, silver, copper, brass, iron, steel, lead, pewter, tin, or other metal, or of which either of these metals or any other metal…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. BeierleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Davies Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Bloomingdale Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Batjer & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  5. De Jonghe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API