Legal Opinion

Thornburgh v. Cole

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1949No. 33382PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.

On April 24, 1945, Mary Thornburgh King and Mac Thornburgh instituted this action in the district court of Okmulgee county against Ben Hur Coal Company, a corporation, and John T. Cole and wife, Adelaide M. Cole, seeking to cancel certain coal mining leases and an overriding royalty contract between defendants, and for damages ■ alleged to have been suffered by them by reason of the overriding royalty contract between the defendants.

Judgment was rendered for the defendants, except that it provided that the coal mining leases would be canceled unless the defendant, Ben Hur Coal Company, began…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knight v. Chicago Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Probst v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Knight v. Chicago Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Hivick v. UrschelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. De Mik v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OldlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Hagood v. HeckersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  5. Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API