Jungk v. Holbrook
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the Fourth district court, Utah county. Hon. A. C. Hatch, Judge. Action on a promissory note by Franz Jungk and another against L. Holbrook and others. Judgment for certain defendants. Plaintiffs appeal. This action was brought against Cropper and Eeed, as makers of three promissory notes for $7,000, and against respondents Holbrook and Duggins, as indorsers. The notes were payable in Salt Lake City, where the plaintiffs resided.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Fourth district court, Utah county. Hon. A. C. Hatch, Judge. Action on a promissory note by Franz Jungk and another against L. Holbrook and others. Judgment for certain defendants. Plaintiffs appeal. This action was brought against Cropper and Eeed, as makers of three promissory notes for $7,000, and against respondents Holbrook and Duggins, as indorsers. The notes were payable in Salt Lake City, where the plaintiffs resided. Eespondents resided in Proyo, in the First district, where the action was brought. Cropper and Eeed resided in .Millard county. Holbrook and Dug-gins…
1Opinion of the CourtMinee, J.
(after stating the facts):
This ease was twice before .the territorial court prior to this appeal. The cases are reported in 9 Utah 49, and 12 Utah 209. Upon each occasion the record discloses Pac. 292. Upon each occasion the record discloses a somewhat dissimilar state of facts. The case now presents a somewhat different state of facts from those presented on the last appeal, so far as appears from the opinion rendered. The first question arises upon the charge of the court as given, and the refusal of the court to charge as requested. In some respects the testimony bearing upon the question…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Chambers v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1896
- Franklin Bank v. CooperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
- Comstock v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Doughty v. SavageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American National Bank v. DonnellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Goodwin v. Abilene State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Konold v. Rio Grande Western Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
- Lambert v. HeatonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.