Legal Opinion
Park 100 Investors, Inc. v. Kartes
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 26, 1995No. 49A05-9402-CV-50PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Judge.
Park 100 appeals the trial court's finding that James and Nancy Kartes are not Hable for unpaid rent under a personal guaranty of lease. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1984, James and Nancy Kartes were part-owners of Kartes Video Communications, Inc. (KVC) in Indianapolis. The com pany was growing rapidly and required larger operating facilities Robert Scannell, a representative of the Park 100 industrial complex in Indianapolis, contacted the Karteses and marketed facilities in Park 100 that KVC could lease. After discussing the general requirements and terms for the new facilities,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pugh's IGA, Inc. v. Super Food Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Bell Ex Rel. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- American Cyanamid Co. v. StephenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. SniderIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Givan v. MastersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Willey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Helen C. Holtz v. J.J.B. Hilliard W.L. Lyons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Anderson v. Indianapolis Indiana AAMCO Dealers Advertising PoolIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Precision Homes of Indiana, Inc. v. PickfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Strodtman v. Integrity Builders, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.