Merced Lumber Co. v. Bruschi
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. K. Law, E. R. Jones, and A. E. Bolton, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to foreclose a lien for materials furnished by the plaintiff to O. T. McCoon, to be used in the erection of a building on the land of the defendant, Bruschi, in accordance with a contract for such erection made between Bruschi and McCoon. The court below sustained a demurrer to the answer of Bruschi, who refused to answer further and thereupon judgment was given for the plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint. McCoon made default. The defendant, Bruschi, appeals from the judgment.
The contract price for the erection of the building was sixty-seven hundred and fifty dollars.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Andrews v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Lewis & Queen v. S. Edmondson & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Burnett v. GlasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- California Portland Cement Co. v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Engebretson v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.