Legal Opinion
Lewis & Queen v. S. Edmondson & Sons
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1952No. Civ. 19031PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs on a labor and material bond given by defendants S. Edmondson & Sons as principals, and defendant New York Casualty Company as surety, defendants appeal.
Facts: Plaintiffs entered into a contract with defendants Edmondson to do certain excavation work on the Los Angeles municipal airport in performance of a contract which defendants Edmondson had with the city of Los Angeles. Plaintiffs Lewis & Queen had executed a labor and material bone] with defendants S. Edmondson & Sons as principal and the casualty company as surety. The bond provided in part as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Pneucrete Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- West Coast Lumber Co. v. NewkirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Union Lumber Co. v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Warden v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.