Legal Opinion
Hartford Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Henry L. Crowley & Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 9, 1954No. Civ. No. 857PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is a civil action under the patent laws. The first count of the amended complaint states a claim for the infringement of three patents, of which the plaintiffs are admittedly the holders, and seeks the usual relief; the second count states an ostensible claim for relief under the Declaratory Judgments Act, and is predicated on a patent of which the defendant is allegedly the owner. The action is before the Court at this time on the motion of the defendant: first, to dismiss the former, or, in the alternative, to stay the trial of the action until after the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caldwell Manufacturing Co. v. Unique Balance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Hartford National Bank & Trust Company, Trustee, and Philips Laboratories, Inc. v. Henry L. Crowley & Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- American Optical Co. v. CurtissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973