Legal Opinion

State v. Clarkin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 2012No. Nos. A10-1286, A11-0548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.

Matthew James Clarkin seeks review of a court of appeals published opinion affirming the district court’s decision to deny Clarkin 222 days of jail credit. Clarkin sought to apply 222 days of jail credit to his harassment/stalking conviction sentence even though the jail credit claim was based on time Clarkin spent in custody on an unrelated parole violation. When the district court sentenced Clarkin on one count of felony harassment/stalking following a plea agreement, the court implicitly denied Clarkin any credit for time spent in custody on the parole…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. State v. DulskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. PatricelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Asfaha v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. FolleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  2. State v. RoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Simeon Leon Brooks v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API