Legal Opinion

State v. Dulski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 1, 1985No. C1-84-1599PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This appeal raised the issue whether a criminal defendant whose probation was revoked and sentence executed following his conviction of an offense committed while on probation was entitled to jail credit for time spent in custody in connection with the current offense prior to the holding of the probation revocation hearing. The Court of Appeals held that the defendant was not entitled to the credit. State v. Dulski, 358 N.W.2d 447 (Minn.App.1984). We granted the defendant’s petition for expedited review. Because we concluded that defendant was entitled to receive…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PatricelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. KlangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Moffitt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. BlondinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. FolleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. GoarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API