Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2000No. 98-912PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

Appellant, Raymond Smith, has raised eleven propositions of law. We have reviewed each and have determined that none justifies reversal of appellant’s conviction for aggravated murder. Pursuant to R.C. 2929.05(A), we have also independently weighed the aggravating circumstance against the evidence presented in mitigation, and reviewed the death penalty for appropriateness and proportionality. For the reasons that follow, we affirm appellant’s conviction and death sentence.

VOIR-DIRE/PRETRIAL ISSUES

Admission of Deposition

In his second proposition of law, appellant argues that his right to…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API