Legal Opinion

Bouwhuis v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1926No. 4448PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This was an action to determine the right to certain seepage and percolating water situated in Weber county, Utah, and for injunctive relief.

The pleadings are voluminous and show that both plaintiffs and defendants claim to be the owners of the water rights in controversy. The court to whom the case was tried found the issues in favor of the plaintiff, and decree was entered accordingly. Defendant appeals, and the only issues on appeal attempted to be presented are such as appear in the following alleged assignments of error:

“I. The court erred in making its findings of fact numbered 4.
“II.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holt v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Egelund v. FayterUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hansen v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Smith v. KnaussUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Fuller v. BurnettUtah Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paxton v. Paxton, Walker Et Ux. v. SameUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hoover v. Utah Nursery Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Sharp v. BowenUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Townsend v. HolbrookUtah Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API