Johnson Et Ux. v. Brinkerhoff
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLAND, Justice.
This cause arises because of disputed claims to the use of underground waters flowing from three artesian wells drilled on the land of the defendant David A. Brinkerhoff. The total flow from the wells is 1.1 cubic feet per second, or 411.75 acre feet during the irrigation season of 183 days. Plaintiffs claim 6/17 of the water, over and above 140 acre feet per season, conceded to defendant. The second amended complaint is for damages for deprivation of use of the water, and to have title quieted in plaintiffs for the amount of water claimed. Cross-complainants John Hansen and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Gibson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- W. H. Blodgett Co. v. Bebe Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Ganas v. TselosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Egelund v. FayterUtah Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Behrens v. Raleigh Hills Hospital, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
- Hudgens v. PROSPER, INC.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- Timm v. DewsnupUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Girard v. ApplebyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Savage v. Utah Youth VillageUtah Supreme Court · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.