Legal Opinion

Adolphson v. Weinstein

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 30, 2001No. AC 20862PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPEAR, J.

The plaintiff, Kenneth B. Adolphson, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from an order of the Probate Court approving the sale of real property that was part of a decedent’s estate. The principle issue on appeal is whether the plaintiff was aggrieved by, and therefore has standing to appeal from, the Probate Court’s decision approving the sale of the property to another bidder. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are undisputed. The defendants Norman Weinstein and Lauren Friedman, administra*593tors of the estate of Louise…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Baskin's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Merrimac Associates, Inc. v. DiSesaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Coughlin v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. O'Halloran v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henriquez v. AllegreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Bailey v. Medical Examining Board for State Employee Disability RetirementConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. In re Jessica M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Cuozzo v. Town of OrangeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Jackson v. PrinceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API