Legal Opinion

Maris v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 14, 1914No. 567PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Moore County; D. B. Hill, Judge. Application by F. X. Adams for the probate of certain papers as the will of E. Van,law, deceased, opposed by C. H. Maris. From a judgment admitting such papers to probate, the contestant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

On August 10, 1912, appellee, Adams, filed in the county court of Moore county his application to probate as the last will and testament of E. Vanlaw three papers as follows: (1) An envelope on which was written horizontally the words “Henry Boyce,” and across the end the word “Notes.” <2) A sheet of paper apparently torn from a small writing tablet, and on which was written the words: “Henry, please except this you and F. X. Adams for the kindness shown me. E. Vanlaw.” (3) A promissory note prepared on a printed blank, a copy of which <the script part being in italics) is as follows:…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Lockbihler v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hunt v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Norris v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Estate of KnoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rea v. PursleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. In Re Yowell's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Estate of GoldsworthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. In Re Estate of YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Laird v. Williams & ChastainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API