Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Young

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1923No. 12068PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court probating an instrument offered as the holographic will of Mrs. M. A. Young. The instrument offered as a will is a letter written by Mrs. Young to her sister and is in the following language :

“Dear Sister : - Feb. 14th, 1901.
“Mr. Young thinks it best for him to go and see. about the rents and when we get possession he is abler to get around better than I am it is not necessary for both to come now the deed will be made to me to do as I please with while I live if I should die first I want you and your heirs to have what I have left.
“I…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. HolscheiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  2. Robnett v. AshlockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Maris v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Whitaker's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Du Sauzay v. Du SauzayMississippi Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Succession of GurganusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  2. Craig v. McVeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. In Re Paull's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Foote v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Hooker v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API