Legal Opinion

Estate of Goldsworthy

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1942No. Civ. 12164PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGLER, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order denying probate to a certain document offered as the holographic will of William G. Goldsworthy. The document in question is written on a printed stationer’s form marked “Crocker’s Blank No. 2508-Will.” This form consists of a double sheet of paper, each sheet being 8y2 by 14 inches in size; the two sheets constitute four pages. On the first page the following printed and written matter appears. For the purpose of clarity all portions in the handwriting of deceased are italicized:

“I,.............................................................…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PlumelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. In Re the Estate of ManchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Estate of BernardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Thorn v. California Academy of SciencesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. In re Estate of BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Crosby v. Crockeranglo National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Estate of BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Estate of FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API