Legal Opinion

Ganzevoort v. Russell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1997No. 01S01-9602-CV-00040PublishedCited by 256 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Judge.

This case presents for review the decision of the Court of Appeals reversing the trial court and dismissing an action for violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act1 brought by the purchaser of residential real property against the seller and the seller’s broker. The judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing the suit is affirmed.

*294I

The subject of this suit is a house and lot located in Hendersonville, Tennessee, which was purchased by defendants Richard Russell and Martha Russell in 1969. The property was occupied as a residence by the Russells until 1991, when…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Carson Creek Vacation Resorts, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Quality Auto Parts Co. v. Bluff City Buick Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by256 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Realty Shop, Inc. v. RR Westminster Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Betty Saint Rogers v. Louisville Land CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Michael Lind v. Beaman Dodge, Inc., d/b/a Beaman Dodge Chrysler JeepTennessee Supreme Court · 2011

251 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API