Legal Opinion

Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1992PublishedCited by 835 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

In this retaliatory discharge action, Plaintiff-Appellant Carl E. Hodges alleges Defendant-Appellee S.C. Toof & Company terminated Plaintiffs employment because of his jury service. At trial, the jury returned a verdict for Plaintiff and awarded him $200,000.00 compensatory and $375,-000.00 punitive damages. The Court of Appeals, while upholding the jury’s finding of retaliatory discharge, vacated the award of compensatory and punitive damages holding that under T.C.A. § 22-4-108, the exclusive remedy for an employee’s discharge because of jury service was…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. Clanton v. Cain-Sloan Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by835 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  4. State v. HooperTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  5. The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

830 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API