Legal Opinion

Ottinger v. Ottinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1956No. Civ. 16565PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

The trial court, in this divorce action, decreed that plaintiff and defendant, formerly wife and husband, were tenants in common of certain property in San Mateo County, and that plaintiff-wife was entitled to $250 attorney’s fees. The defendant-husband appeals.

The parties were married in April of 1929 in Missouri, and went to live with defendant’s parents on a farm near Green-ville, Tennessee. The marriage was not a happy one. In January of 1930, plaintiff, after being severely beaten by defendant, left the farm, went to live in Greenville, secured a job, and filed an action for divorce.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beals ex rel. Walker v. AresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hudson v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Estate of MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of ImperatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Polk v. PolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Union Bank v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API