Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Hudson
California Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1959No. S. F. 19886PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*738TRAYNOR, J.
Defendant appeals from an. order granting plaintiff temporary alimony, attorney’s fees, court costs, and other relief in her action for divorce and permanent alimony.
The parties were married in Reno, Nevada, on May 3, 1947. They moved to California in 1950, and plaintiff is still domiciled in this state. Defendant left their home on April 6, 1957, announcing his intention to go' to Reno, obtain a divorce, and return in about six weeks. Plaintiff filed her action on April 22, 1957, and defendant was personally served in Idaho on May 16, 1957. Defendant filed his action for divorce…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Esenwein v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. EsenweinSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Verone Marin Fehlhaber, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Robert F. Fehlhaber, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Davey v. Los Angeles County Bureau of AdoptionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.